Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether it is superior for individuals to utilize their mobile phones at any time. Although a school of thought acknowledges that this inclination might be beneficial in some facets, I would align myself with the opinion that this proclivity could be riddled with numerous pitfalls.
On the one hand, a plethora of justifications has convinced some individuals to advocate the former perception. The first reason stems from the fact that using mobile phones might be quite time-saving in terms of keeping in touch with other people. For example, a person only needs to spare about one or two minutes for dialing a phone number, compared to around one or two hours that he needs to allocate for a face-to-face meeting. As a result, individuals are capable of interacting with others in an easier way without needing to lavish time on communicating directly. Furthermore, in workplace, using mobile phones could be considered to be one of the most effective ways for departments of a company to catch in touch with each other. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that the employees of some offices such as IGM 3 or Certiport, which are the subsidiaries of Microsoft, can interact with the manager department in the USA in order to handle strenuous tasks. Hence, but for the interaction between the sections of Microsoft via mobile phones, a tremendous amount of workloads of could not be done and this corporation could not attain remarkable success.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling factors persuading me to concede that this trend could have some drawbacks. Firstly, leveraging mobile phones excessively can pose a threat to the health of users. This is because green light emitted from this electrical gadget would have deleterious impacts on the eyes of people using it. To illustrate, it has been proved by many studies that spending too much time using mobile phones can render users more susceptible to some optical diseases like seeing impairment or long-sightedness. Therefore, they ought to reduce the frequency of using this electrical device to prevent from suffering health problems. Moreover, being over dependent on mobile phones to communicate might make the relationships between workers in a firm eroded since employees cannot have mutual understanding and sympathy towards other counterparts when interacting online. It could lead to the fact that workers might find it very difficult for them to cooperate and devote their endeavors to tackle issues that their companies have to confront.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that there are plenty of benefits that people are able to derive from using mobile phone to keep in touch with others; nevertheless, I want to affirm that this propensity might exert some unfavorable influences on users and society.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between years 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time 73
- Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...uccess. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling factors persuading me to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 464.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19396551724 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92930666619 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549568965517 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7775527334 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.764705882 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2941176471 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210002835813 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735596024979 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041032723634 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131057391492 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366909155354 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.