In the recent times, the anonymity as well as freedom of broadcasting on the Internet has enabled each individual to express their views, which has rendered the cyberspace unreliable. If questioned, I agree to such a view to a major extent. My inclination is explained further.
There are several reasons to support my argument. The first one is dubious sources of information. In other words, the ability of publishing posts is given by all social media, blog and many other platforms, which leaves the Internet brimming with fallacious information. For example, any user can post an update on Facebook and be received and forwarded by many other users. Apart from that, there is no monitoring on the Internet. To elaborate, in contrast with the conventional methods of learning news such as newspapers and TV channels, this mode has no censoring or double checking by qualified individuals, which leaves its reputation questionable. As per a research, an average user comes across 47% fake posts in a daily browsing of a social media.
Furthermore, the content creators of modern media have no journalism ethics. This is to say that earlier when news was broadcast on news networks and other information was shared by prestigious reference books; however, the current publishers, which is an average user with a mobile phone and Internet network, has no moral values and sensitivity. Finally, the Cyberspace allows mass communication, which makes the false information spread faster. Unlike previous decades, contemporary technology allows many types of rumors and fallacious news to go viral and manipulate mass.
Nevertheless, I would not overlook the other aspect as well. Mainly because currently information accompanies evidence. This is to say that in previous times, the receivers relied on the broadcaster solely and believed anything, whereas now all viewers demand evidence. For instance, there are videos, sting operations, and live streams, which cannot be doctored and is more believable. Moreover, there is more transparency due to multiple sources. People can cross verify all news as well as follow and subscribe to more prestigious sources.
In conclusion, although the clarity and proofs offered by the Internet are undeniable, my arguments convince that to a major extent, this arena of receiving information is not believable due to ethical and technical reasons. I believe one should always have adegree of healthy skepticism towards anything one reads on theInternet
- Anyone can post information on the internet Some people say most of what we read on the Internet is inaccurate To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think the best way to stay fit is joining a gym health club while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both the views with your opinion 67
- Newspapers have an enormous influence on people s opinions and ideas Why is it Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'medium'?
Suggestion: medium
...e posts in a daily browsing of a social media. Furthermore, the content creators o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s shared by prestigious reference books; however, the current publishers, which i...
^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sparency due to multiple sources. People can cross verify all news as well as fol...
^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ople can cross verify all news as well as follow and subscribe to more prestigious sourc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e prestigious sources. In conclusion, although the clarity and proofs offer...
^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous sources. In conclusion, although the clarity and proofs offered by the...
^^
Line 9, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n conclusion, although the clarity and proofs offered by the Internet are und...
^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion, although the clarity and proofs offered by the Internet are undeniable,...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh the clarity and proofs offered by the Internet are undeniable, my argument...
^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... healthy skepticism towards anything one reads on theInternet
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38520408163 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99340587071 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.5809281521 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9545454545 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77272727273 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137644883792 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346701321044 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347988582039 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747582225055 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162040348328 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.