Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children's development, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people say that art subjects should be obligatory in high school curriculum. While it is true that these subjects can be beneficial for students to some extent, I would argue that it should not be compulsory.
To begin with, there are several advantages of drawing and painting. Firstly, since students have to imagine and transfer details of objects which they are drawing to their paintings, their imagination and creativity could be improved. For example, when drawing a picture of animals or scenery, students let their imagination run wild and express their work of art in a unique way. This could positively contribute to their well-balanced development. Secondly, because students have opportunities to approach art subjects early in schools, they could discover their potential talents in art. This would allow them to dedicate time and effort to develop their skills, which might make them become famous artists in the future.
However, I do not think high school students should be forced to take part in art classes. First, currently, students have to study many subjects such as Mathematics or Physics which are prerequisite for university entrance exams. Therefore, forcing these students to spend time on drawing or painting might increase pressure on them. This could negatively affect their quality of learning. Additionally, because drawing materials such as drawing papers or colored pens are usually expensive, buying these materials could be difficult for students who have tight budget. Consequently, their families could bear unnecessary financial burden.
In conclusion, while it is true that there are some benefits for students when learning to draw or paint, I believe these subjects should not be compulsory in high school.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 66
- Because people increasingly eat at restaurant, all restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the meals they serve. This knowledge makes it easier for diners to make healthy choices and reduces the risk of diet related health 50
- Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique way" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... run wild and express their work of art in a unique way. This could positively contribute to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41818181818 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76893272395 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4654036047 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239256352201 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899713372302 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806779465588 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18592543218 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630820832379 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.