Artificial Intelligence (AI) will soon replace teachers in the classroom.
Do you agree with this statement ?
What is an alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching ?
Many people believe that teachers are going to be replaced by AI in the near future. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view for some reasons and there is another way can replace tradition face-to-face teaching that is online teaching method.
The main reason why I believe that AI can’t replace teachers is because it doesn’t have passion for teaching. With no passionate, AI can’t share precious knowledge with students. This means that student can’t clearly understand what AI has taught and students may become robotics rather than human-like as they are. For example, students with bored mood could not study well at that time and they didn’t understand the lesson. As a result, AI with no passionate, it couldn’t spread knowledge in another way to help students understand.
Online teaching method can now replace traditional face-to-face teaching method. This is because people are now connected to each other via the Internet and that means teachers and students can easily connect together without going to school. This method greatly reduces the amount of time people spend travelling means that both students and teachers have more time to do more meaningful things. For example, students normally spend around 30 minutes going to school and so do teachers. But with social media, they don’t need to waste that period of time and they still can work together with high efficiency.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with whether AI can replace teachers in school because it has no passionate. And I think online teaching method should be extremely welcomed by people all over the world because of the benefis it brings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | kevinluffy2001 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 547, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...dia, they don't need to waste that period of time and they still can work together with h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, still, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27407407407 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6973136054 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0748506234 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23862847601 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957606043198 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076019165689 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171326292518 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753179641496 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.