The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many people are wedded to the idea that the standard health of residents have a tendency to be improved in the future thanks to the comprehensive development of human life. However, I wholly disagree with this opinion and this essay will discuss both views of the argument in further details.
On the one hand, there are two prime reasons why many people believe that human health will be developed in later generations. First of all, the life expectancy of people is significantly lengthened in recent years due to the progress of medicine. In particular, medical discoveries as well as the integration of cutting-edge technologies into the treatment of diseases play a vital role in this breakthrough. Secondly, the personal income of citizens nowadays is higher than in previous years. As a result, there is no doubt that they can be exposed to higher living standard. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this situation, pregnant women today enjoy a better quality of healthcare system in comparison with older generations such as health insurance.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that people’s health are suffering from various concerning problems. The recession of local habitat deems to be a controversial in these days. A great number of natural disasters, which are very common in all countries today such as global warming, climate change may exert an adverse influence on human health. Additionally, although there are several reasons that come from natural, human activities are still the main cause. For example, according to the analysis of many scientist in some developing countries the overwhelming number of vehicles such as private cars or motorbikes is the root cause of air pollution, which pose a serious threat to the quality of human health.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people are confronted with several issues that bring many negative effects on their health in the near future, the government and individuals should figure out some viable solution to cope with this global phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | phanduydat | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Abbas_one | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
- 06/6/2015: Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it, however, others prefer to give money to the national or international charities, discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important and should it be preserved or is international music that is heard everywhere nowadays more useful to a society? 78
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...r example, according to the analysis of many scientist in some developing countries the overwh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28307692308 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90524764957 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2729774919 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20246490303 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636057110675 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428830833497 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130177512285 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538467316987 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.