The bar graph shows the number of overseas students enrolled in the first year law course at a college.
The bar graph demonstrate the overseas students take admission according to the gender and in interesting field of law at college.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while male students of Indonesia and Japan were respectively, shoot up. At this point, France students were tumble.
With regarding to in Iran males and females students go down in labour law which are about 5 and 3 students respectively and next which who company law student approximately double. Additionally, in Philippines there are 3 males students and 1female are considerably intrusting in labour law and in the company law student dramatically changed. In contrast, Indonesia labour law student remainly same as well as females. But company law male students is shoot up.
Turning to, in Japan males students are soar intrusting and females are approximately 5 students. However, France is a country which are no one female students of company law very decline students of labour law. Following this, total number of students steadily same and 3 students are reached at the final.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-16 | Sukchain appur 56 | 56 | view |
- The two charts show the participants and generation in particular country. 11
- The Brick Manufacturing Process 78
- Islip town centre now and planned development. 73
- The Brick Manufacturing Process 78
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results. While others believe that it is a more important to reward students who show improvement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tumbled'.
Suggestion: tumbled
...up. At this point, France students were tumble. With regarding to in Iran males and f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 174.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86999778806 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3086596422 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305922830464 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146975002654 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788603351974 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217935223903 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837910394192 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.