Being a celebrity, such as a famous film star or sports personality, brings problems as well as benefits. Do the advantages of being a celebrity outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, there is an increasing number of superstars in all fields such as entertainment or sport. While some people argue that this brings about several disadvantages, I believe the benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of being a celebrity. The first problem would be lack of privacy. Due to the excessive public and media attention, stars are often followed by some paparazzi. As a result, their personal information such as marriage lives or house addresses appears in gossip magazines, which might lead to annoyance. Another minus point is that because of the audience's high expectations for famous people, these personalities are likely to suffer from stress and other mental issues. In other words, these individuals usually work really hard to perform well in order to avoid being roundly criticised by the public.
On the other hand, it is reasonable why being well-known in certain fields can be beneficial. Firstly, fame can provide people with considerable wealth. For instance, renowned individuals are paid a large amount of money for attending social events or participating in advertisements. If these people are not famous, their income will be much lower. Secondly, achieving a certain level of career success, superstars usually gain admiration from average people. Consequently, they can act as positive role models for other people, which is a unique experience.
In conclusion, although fame can lead to the lack of privacy and some mental problems, I think the plus points, which are richness and people’s admiration, are greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-02 | DIEU PHUONG | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 61 | view |
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 43
- The media should include more stories which report good news To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do the advantages of being a celebrity outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32411067194 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92485311359 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1947427587 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183935677062 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604444395453 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549265146228 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931260635096 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630720113246 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.