The best way to deal with rising problem of traffic and transportation is by encouraging people to live in cities rather than suburbs.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, cities are seeing a crisis of traffic congestion and problems with tranportation. Some people believe that the best way to deal with this is to motivate people to live in urban areas instead of living in outskirts and countrysides. However, I do not agree with this notion because it would enhance the problem rather than solving it and it would lead to other catastrophies.
To begin with, rising population of cities leads to more busy roads. If citizens would increase in number, the number of people using either public or private transport would definitely become high. As a result, the traffic would become heavy and there would be more chances of people getting stuck in traffic. Hence, they would not be able to reach in time to their committed places. A recent study suggested that owing to rise in the population of cities the traffic problems have doubled than they were in past.
In addition to this, public transportations would not able to accomodate all the inhabitants. Since the demand would be higher than the availability, common man would suffer. Because public transportation is economical, most of people use it, but when the riders would rise tremendously, they would not be entertained. This will also lead to inflation and poverty. Furthermore, the supplies of certain products from rural areas, for instance, milk and crops, would decrease. Hence, in the end public would have to deal with negative consequences.
To conclude, though traffic problems in cities are rising, they cannot be solved by encouraging more peopl to live in cities because this would ultimately enhance the existing problems and will also lead to new ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ic problems have doubled than they were in past. In addition to this, public trans...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...se public transportation is economical, most of people use it, but when the riders would rise ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ance the existing problems and will also lead to new ones.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76862229665 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7375929669 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261338156626 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945637598537 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743847446308 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192148803007 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983104126819 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.