The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, furnishing public transport for all the time without charging a fee to solve traffic jam issue has become a subject of intensive debate. Although I agree that the government could serve free public transport to solve the problem of traffic congestion, I do not consider that it’s the best way.
On the one hand, providing free public transport is a major improvement in the traffic flow. Firstly, giving a totally free bus or train would encourage people to use public transport and avoid traffic snarl-up. Thereby, people could save money paying for gas, parking fees and taxes. Furthermore, this solution play a crucial role in cutting down the number of cars and motorbikes on the streets, and reduce the percentage or risk of an accident to occur is also high. Anecdotal evidence shows that one train could take about two hundreds cars off the road.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages to take into consideration before applying a free public transport system day by day. Firstly, the administration will have to bear an extremely huge burden of costs. You may provide a system that’s free but offering a rather poor quality of service if you can’t afford to replace vehicles, offer better wages to drivers and so on. Secondly, there are a variety of dangers when people use public transport. For instance, the risk of being the criminal victim is high or people have to wait for a long time to have a bus or train. Additionally, driving at night may be perilous not only for drivers but also for passengers.
After discussing all the points mentioned above, I can finally conclude that the government should serve appropriately free public transport and combine with other measures to solve traffic gridlock.
c
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | Mahek Malhotra | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | Linh. | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | hplong93 | 82 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | JennieD | 64 | view |
| 2018-03-18 | rimanpreet | 73 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 78
- In many countries, people now wear Western clothes (suits, jeans) rather than traditional clothing. Why? Is this a positive or negative development. 84
- New technologies have change the way children spend their time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... appropriately free public transport and combine with other measures to solve tra...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: C
...er measures to solve traffic gridlock. c
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97972972973 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70066646267 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9927714868 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306811518526 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995761998867 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094108444523 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185345744482 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757071433297 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.