The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, to regulate the hug goods driver (HGD) license annually is expected to comfort the road users. Partially, I consent to the same point of view for several reasons which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, to convey the cargo safely with imposing a driving assessment each year might suffer the driver from extra cost of license renewal fees. In terms of their income, the lorry driver is difficult to cover higher living standard. If this regulation were imposed, they would endure supplementary financial burden. Furthermore, to be conducted per year, the bureaucracy would portray tribulations, particularly its administration in which this incriminates transactional politics including commercialism and nepotism. Thus, not only this new system but also public trust will be major challenges for a country.
On the flip side, this issue could bring benefits related to ensure the drivers' physical fitness in terms of safe arrival goods. This would bring trust to the driver who is viewed as a professional to fulfill their responsibility. Subsequently, the company could minimise loss profit and enhance the level of consumer satisfaction. In addition, freight transportation has a risky work which need such regulation to avoid the worst case on the road. The more rigid the regulation is, the less reckless driving the government could prevent high number of road accidents.
To sum up, it seems to me that imposing the law of annual driving test regarding the road safety bring several benefits such as assuring well-fitted drivers and reducing traffic-related death rate. This is as long as the license fee would be affordable for the drivers.
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree 26
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 90
- Eco tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities What problems can this cause How can these problems be resolved 89
- Transporting children to school is said to be the responsibility of the government However some people think this is the responsibility of the parents Discuss both views and give your own 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
Nowadays, to regulate the hug goods driver HGD license annually is expected...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bureaucracy would portray tribulations, particularly its administration in which...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2750929368 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97249498355 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4766693157 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132380587917 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413947821299 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406539189657 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795333242036 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00443274109023 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.