Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about problems related to the world environmental protection. Furthermore, using fuel as a source of energy has caused a heated debate due to its huge harmful disadvantages for the environment. It is, therefore, reasonable that increasing the fuel price would be a bright solution to cope with environmental problems.
Firstly, there is no doubt that the consumption of fuel leads to air pollution and water pollution. Buring fuel results in discharging a huge amount of contaminated gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and so on. This emission, therefore, is the main source of pollutants leading to the ozone layer depletion that takes ages to be fully recovered. On the other hand, in terms of water pollution, oil leakage in the ocean posing a threat to aquatic animals makes the oceanic economy falls out to great depression. Petroleum industries must be held accountable for its action of leaking oil.
Last but not least, fuel exploiting exerts significant effects on the human body’s strength. Either dust or harmful gases not only destroy the biodiversity but also absorb to human body and causes chronic diseases such as lung cancer. A further point to note is that as the Earth is widely exposed to the Sun due to the ozone layer depletion, radiation from the outer space strikes directly on our skins leading to skin cancer. As long as fuel keeps being utilized, our lives will be threaten every single day.
In conclusion, fuel usage obviously poses a threat not only to the ecosystem but also to ourselves. It is not to say that fuel should be abandoned and ignore its contribution to the development of society. However, by increasing the price of fuel could reduce more harmful impacts to the environment.
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 78
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06397306397 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86087918066 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0565393144 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166191323105 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057064210056 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060919972787 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10899143564 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755296075096 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.