The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, environmental protection has been receiving a great deal of public attention due to its huge impacts on humankind. While some argue that increasing the fuel price for vehicles is the ultimate approach to address environmental deterioration, the adoption of a single solution might not be effective, regarding its limitations.
On the one hand, there are the following main reasons for advocating this idea. First, by raising the fuel cost for vehicles, there would be a significant decrease in the amount of exhaust fumes from transport vehicles. It is an indication that this acts as an incentive for the adoption of other public transportation, which directly guards against the air pollution.
Second, as this strategy puts greater burden on fuel cost, it will motivate vehicle businesses to further utilize renewable energy sources to manufacture cars, motorbikes or buses which are environmentally-friendly. This increased demand for alternative vehicles could lead to more investment in research and development of electric vehicle technology, which could result in the dramatic reduction of the reliance on fossil fuels.
On the other hand, there are many limitations of this idea. First, there is a lack of the popularity of transport infrastructures such as high railways or rapid transit in developing countries, especially in the third-world one, citizens, therefore, have no choice but to possess their own personal vehicles for commuting. If the government approves the policy of higher fuel price, this would inevitably cause harm to their less affluent ciziten's fortune which makes citizen’s lives more miserable. Second, regarding the incompetent capabilities to partly address the roots of environmental problems while there are other main contributors for the pollution. For example, industrial factories should hold the majority responsible for the air pollution, soil pollution and water pollution as they are breeding grounds for toxic chemical wastes linking with the intensification of the greenhouse gasses, the death of aquatic animals and habitat destruction respectively.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the policy of higher fuel cost is not without advantages in protecting the environment, it should be parallel implemented with other strategies to bring the best results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64957264957 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26771063728 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60113960114 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9033569531 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.538461538 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240936076333 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807617384896 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407338567624 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132008150572 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155176929301 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.