The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the petrol price is believed to be the best solution to alleviate environmental issues. From my point of view, although this measure can help tackle air pollution to a degree, this is not the most optimal way as creating environmental social awareness would be a more effective approach.
On the one hand, increasing fuel prices would lead to a decrease in using this kind of energy, helping to reduce the large amount of exhaust fume in the atmosphere that contaminates the air. Indeed, once the cost per transportation kilometer soars, commuters may resort to another cost-saving means of transport or decrease their time on the road. For instance, in the year 2022, fuel costs busted out worldwide when the economy recovered after the COVID-19 pandemic, during that time, many people transitioned to riding bikes or using public transportation while other groups of people chose online work. In addition, the increase in fuel costs fosters humans into using alternative energy and inventing energy-saving machines, devices, or vehicles. To illustrate, in Vietnam, electric vehicles produced by Vinfast Corporation have become more and more preferable resting not only on cost-saving traits but also on state-of-the-art functions that are not inferior to normal motorbikes or cars.
However, I still opine that an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues and a global awareness campaign is the most feasible option. To be more specific, the causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals used in both agriculture and industry which contaminate air, water, and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods. For example, if governments apply a lower tax on companies that leave less impact on their surroundings, enterprises will proactively find ways to reduce their carbon footprint. Besides, in terms of individual consumption, more environmentally friendly shopping habits, such as using fabric bags, should be educated and spread out among consumers through purchase incentives and marketing campaigns.
In conclusion, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel partly addresses air pollution. However, I suppose that it is not the best resolution for complicated environmental problems that demand a comprehensive global campaign to convey messages and education so that each individual and group can consciously protect the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58695652174 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12775818207 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6038647343 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3026759216 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.214285714 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18070447657 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626020117163 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365174216493 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111881793856 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258676015538 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.