The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the petrol price is believed to be the best solution to alleviate environmental issues. From my point of view, although this measure can help tackle air pollution to a degree, this is not the most optimal way as it may detrimentally impact the global economy that depends much on fuel while creating environmental social awareness would be a more effective approach.
On the one hand, to some extent, a surge in fuel prices would positively impact the habitat on the Earth. First and foremost, it may decrease demand for vehicles using this kind of energy, thus reducing harmful emissions that pollute the atmosphere. Indeed, once the expense per kilometer soars to an unaffordable level, commuters would resort to cheaper means of transportation, such as bikes, buses, or electric vehicles, which remarkably lowers the level of exhausted fume amount released into the air. Furthermore, the governments could impose tax on fuel purchases to fund environmental cleanup and conservation programs. As done in many countries, this would ensure that the general population’s demand for petrol can facilitate the restoration of pollution damage caused by fuel emission.
However, I still opine that while an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues, it may pose a crisis to the global economy. To be more specific, the causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals used in both agriculture and industry which contaminate air, water, and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods. Moreover, if fuel becomes more expensive, transportation will follow, and businesses bear the brunt of this impact, which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. As a result, the economy would undergo inflation and discontentment would appear among the population, thus hindering the betterment of society.
In conclusion, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel partly addresses air pollution. However, I suppose that it is not the best resolution for complicated environmental problems that demand a comprehensive global campaign to convey messages and education so that each individual and group can consciously protect the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49484536082 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25880838278 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7033943286 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.285714286 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155638470566 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550406041481 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436676498184 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102755978384 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321173383769 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.