The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the petrol price is believed to be the best solution to alleviate environmental issues. From my point of view, although this measure can help tackle air pollution to a degree, this is not the most optimal way as it may detrimentally impact the global economy that depends much on fuel while creating environmental social awareness would be a more effective approach.
On the one hand, to some extent, a surge in fuel prices positively impacts the habitat on the Earth. First and foremost, it may decrease demand for vehicles using this kind of energy, thus reducing harmful emissions that pollute the atmosphere. Indeed, once the expense per kilometer soars to an unaffordable level, commuters will resort to cheaper means of transportation, such as bikes, buses, or electric vehicles, which remarkably lowers the level of exhausted fume amount released into the air. Furthermore, the governments can impose tax on fuel purchases to fund environmental cleanup and conservation programs. As done in many countries, this ensures that the general population’s demand for petrol can facilitate the restoration of pollution damage caused by fuel emission.
However, I still opine that while an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues, it may pose a crisis to the global economy. To be more specific, the causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals used in both agriculture and industry which contaminate air, water, and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods. Moreover, if fuel becomes more expensive, transportation will follow, and businesses bear the brunt of this impact, which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. Consequently, the economy would undergo inflation and discontentment would appear among the population.
In conclusion, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel partly addresses air pollution. From my viewpoint, the economy can face a crisis because of the frenzy of upward fluctuation of fuel prices and a comprehensive global campaign to convey education and regulation is the most superior resolution for environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that the newspaper is the best way to learn about news while others believe that a more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53050397878 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42104942129 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588859416446 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1848061977 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.928571429 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139821241577 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509492196588 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403271551146 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880409862686 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120506962795 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.