The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and give an example to support your idea.
Environmental deterioration is one of the most rising problems happening more and more frequently at the moment. Many people believe that increasing the price of fossil fuels should be given top priority, yet, from my perspective, it cannot be a best solution to tackle this issue due to two main reasons that will be addressed below.
To begin with, the substantial dependence on patrols of industrial domains in contemporary days is the first one. It is obvious that fossil fuels plays a pivotal role in manufacturing and producing of industrial globalization through an enormous wealth of factories and companies have been running into operation in contemporary days in order to meet dwellers and their needs on a regular basics as well as boasting the economy of country. This is clearly reflected in China where more and more industrial zones have been established year by year, discharging an inordinate amount of gas emissions into the atmosphere. They completely figure out that their actions have a devastating effect on environment but they could not restrict taking advantage of fuels in their manufacturing because it would not be beneficial for them and probably stagnates the economy causing unfavorable consequences for their country later.
Secondly, people cannot stop using fossil fuels at once because of its indispensable role the daily life. We can easily notice this phenomenon has become more prevalent in Vietnam where people still make best of that for their jobs every day although the cost was fluctuated many times in the past. According to Vnexpress.com, which is one of the most prestigious newspapers in this country, reported that inhabitants overwhelmingly stated fuels namely oils, patrols are an essential part of their lives, and that is the reason why they willing to give a big amount of money for them in order to meet their needs. The cost will be the main cause provoking controversial issues in the general public, nevertheless, when people could not afford to pay.
In conclusion, increasing the price of fuels cannot be a best way to solve the environmental issues nowadays from aforementioned things.
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and give an example to support your idea. 73
- The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and give an example to support your idea. 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Environmental deterioration is one of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... yet, from my perspective, it cannot be a best solution to tackle this issue due ...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasons that will be addressed below. To begin with, the substantial dependenc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consequences for their country later. Secondly, people cannot stop using fossi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e provoking controversial issues in the general public, nevertheless, when people could not af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when people could not afford to pay. In conclusion, increasing the price of f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...increasing the price of fuels cannot be a best way to solve the environmental iss...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21037463977 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99002985781 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5734870317 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.7463122511 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.363636364 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5454545455 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107506799533 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438242725635 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430477369459 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859887715808 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504599966451 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.