The line graph illustrates changes in the number of participants in the Olympics between 1924 and 2012, while the bar graph provides information about the number of male and female participants.
Generally, the number of Olympic players grew noticeably over the period. Until 1984, it rose slowly almost twofold from 3000 to 7000. Afterwards, it rocketed to over 10000 people as its final mark.
Regarding the bar graph, it is noticeable that the majority of athletes were males until 2012. Between 1924 and 1984, the number of both genders grew gradually from 3000 to approximately 5000 for men and from slightly below 1000 to 1500 for women. After that, in 2012, the number of females underwent a sharp climb increasing by 3300 and ending the period up with under 5000. In addition, the males reached the final mark of 6000 people.
Overall, it is apparent that the number of competitors in the Olympics experienced a significant boost since the beginning of the period, especially the number of female participants.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant. 56
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 78
- The charts below give Information about travel to and from the UK a nd about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05917159763 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7043426958 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7070988772 44.8134815571 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 4.34317383033 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123036791814 0.216113520407 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455147914246 0.0766984524023 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633350304328 0.0603063233224 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865180470846 0.12726935374 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727472396972 0.0580467560999 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.