Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now ‘one big traffic jam.’
How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Over the last thirty years, our cities unprecentened growth of redundance of automobiles on the roads and as a result of this our world became as one huge traffic jam. I completely agree with this statement. In this essay, some possible solutions will be proposed.
In these years, traffic jam has been one of the widdest issue all over the world. It was happened due to the huge numbers production of cars and also some countries import cars from another countries. Thanks to the modern innovations people can buy different kind of cars' type following their tastes. Consequently, this lead to the fact that even a poor and middle class of society can easily purchase automobiles. However, urban residents do not anticipated that as a result of traffic congestion the problem with air pollution and lack of resources can be strengthened.
There also many alternative measures that government can initiate to contain this issue of increasing cars on roads. Firstly, authorities should provide with financial burden of owing an automobiles by imposing tax on car's sales and fueles. Secondly, they need establish a law which will prohibit some citizens who have more than one or two private transport. Therefore, inhabitants can be sure that transfer by public transport is more safely and low-pricely and also they may invest more income to this.
In conclusion, majority countries struggle with traffic congestion, authorities can improve this situation by imposing the tax on car's ownership and reconstruct vehicle infrastructure although it can negative effects to the countries' economic development.
- The bar chart below shows the number of reserch students studying different subjects in 2011 80
- The bar chart below shows zhe number of research students defferent subject in 2005
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 61
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29296875 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9298411418 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63671875 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8904170788 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2911549442 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954649942853 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604309322689 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163377853062 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405936208304 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.