Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer.
In recent years, the fact that governments are frantically attempting to promote festivals to generate revenue is not a new trend. However, the money made is thought to be of better use if it is invested in social programmes for the impoverished. Although I agree with this opinion, there are other aspects that we need to look at.
To use the profits from this form of economy on anti-poverty programmes is a humane act with clear benefits. First of all, by spending more money on poor people, we can provide them with a boost, and such propel them to a better life. One way the government can do this is to lend the poor people this money as a capital for them to invest in their own business, then return the money when they have made enough money to live comfortably. Another benefit of this approach is that it can severely help with reducing crime. As people get more financially independent, the need to commit petty crimes such as theft and shoplifting is no longer present. As a result, it can help in forming a better community.
On the flip side, spending all of that money on the poor would not be a good move in the current situation. After the devastating pandemic and its effects on the economy and society, any source of income would be greatly beneficial to a local community and a nation as a whole. These can be used to aid small businesses back to work, as well as compensating for the months of inactivities among the community.
In conclusion, although using revenues from festivals on social programmes for the poor is indeed a great way to utilize the profits, we must also take into account the current circumstance and shift the spending to the areas that are more vital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | buitony | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | ayofigo | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | phil999 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | hieunganngan | 43 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | hieunganngan | 61 | view |
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons 73
- Modern society is becoming more concerned about the increase in juvenile crime What do you think is the cause of the increase in juvenile crime What solutions can you suggest 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hs of inactivities among the community. In conclusion, although using revenues f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61513157895 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66202575985 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3177116905 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295476550071 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094810212111 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633159753221 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171723484611 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826881044109 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.