The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.
The bar graphs show the percentages of the population in terms of age in both genders of France and India in 1984.
Overall, while the age structure of men and women equalized in India, the proportions of women were higher than male at the same age in France. Besides, the population of India was younger than France in 1984.
In India, the age group below 5 was the most popular resident who accounted for nearly 14% of the national population. When people grow older, the percentage which people accounted for population tends to decrease, and the lowest point was 2% in the age group 65-70. Inhabitants who aged over 70 occupied nearly 3% of age structure.
In France, people aged 40-45 had the same figure with their counterpart in India (6%). While the rates in aged groups below 40 were lesser than these figures in India, the age group 30-35 had the highest point (8%) and higher than the equivalent figure in India (7%). Residents aged over 70 accounted for 10% in France population.
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 73
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 61
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 84
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothersgo out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or anegative development? 61
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...India was younger than France in 1984. In India, the age group below 5 was the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 174.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7183908046 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44198776971 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 506.74238477 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2931370252 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 7.06120827912 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368231622552 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172381514012 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815614775891 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254413108765 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636592411514 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 78.4519038076 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.