Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is common knowledge that financial stability has always played a vital role in person’s destiny. As money is not uniformly distributed in the world, society is divided into different stratums where youngsters become adjusted to the reality of life in different ways. Although, I do agree juveniles from high-class families can afford more conveniences, those with humble background are harassed with realities of life and gradually become more resistant to them.
On the one hand, the majority of wealthy parents tend to provide their kids with comfortable living and pamper them with gorgeous conveniences. There can be no doubt that, these sons and daughters can easily continue their studies, consume more, buy good quality products, go on holidays and do numerous activities. All these things contribute to a more enjoyable and versatile life which does not imply any obstacles. For instance, my classmate whose moneyed parents equipped him with own business from the first-year course, developed it freely and now he prospers knowing nothing about its foundation. In other words, affluent guys acquire what they are presented with and their only aim is to be capable to develop this gift.
On the other hand, children from lower classes are destined to be self-dependent and sovereign excluding any support. In order to remain capable to afford something in life they have to find a part-time job that makes them obtain solid experience and cope with challenges. For example, my neighbour Mark started his successful career as a clerk and now he owns a thriving company. Thus, stumbling over difficulties gives a human the impetus to improve themselves and go to the goal.
Taking everything into consideration, it can be concluded the more deadlocks a man faces on the way, the better expertise they gain. This helps not only manage with burdens of life but also increase its quality.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
2019-04-02 | nhihoang01 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behaviour What is your opinion 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- The best way to travel is travel in a group led by a tour guide To what extent do you agree or disagree 31
- Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas 89
- These days more and more people like to use their favourite social media websites to get the latest news and learn about what is happening around the world This leads to confusion and the spread of misinformation more than ever Why do you think that socia 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is common knowledge that financial st...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually become more resistant to them. On the one hand, the majority of wealthy...
^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd now he owns a thriving company. Thus, stumbling over difficulties gives a huma...
^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... improve themselves and go to the goal. Taking everything into consideration, it...
^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of life but also increase its quality.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19480519481 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79291745738 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659090909091 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.433683675 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186621495328 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532274654065 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452926848687 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102322144557 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352914979938 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.