The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

This graph illustrates the number of people put behind the bars during 50-year period in the twentieth century. Overall, the highest rate of people being jailed was demonstrated by US with exception of the earliest period and the mid of the century.

Drawing our attention to the 1930-s it is clearly seen that UK displayed the lowest ratio in comparison to the other participants of the survey and count 20 thousand people which was 100 lower than the Canada. Nevertheless, New Zealand and the USA stood at the level of 100 individuals. Looking at the 40-s of the previous century, the rate of prisoners rose in the US and Canada at 120 and approximately 100 humans respectively which showed the greatest rate at that time. As for the rest applicants their position remained stable during the following 30 years at 30 thousand ones with the deviation of about 25 thousand people. However, in the 1970 3 countries had the same figures and stood at 70 thousand ratio. US and Canada displayed approximately the same rates till 1970. While there was a level off at 80 thousand humans ?by? Canada New Zealand and the UK the USA had 1 half as high citizens in prison as these countries

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-09 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 73 view
2019-09-25 michidmaa 89 view
2019-09-10 kulwa 56 view
2019-07-17 Pparth300 78 view
2019-07-17 Sunnydeol 56 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... showed the greatest rate at that time. As for the rest applicants their position ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, nevertheless, so, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74396135266 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65889261001 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2235004754 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109589650878 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437740173274 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478267734544 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062063070555 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062063070555 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.