Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional past times than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with the statement Wr

With the highly advanced technology, there has been a sharp rise in electronic devices. A plethora of students are overusing electronic ones for entertainment purposes. It is recommended that children should join in outdoor activities rather than stay indoors all day. From my perspective, I am a p protagonist of this statement.
First and foremost, participating in outdoor activities can have a positive effect on their development at adolescence. As the time children spend on computer or television is limited, it can prevent them from short-sighted eyes, addiction and so on. If not properly controlled, this may render students addicted and seriously affect their academic study. Moreover, The Public Health Agency report that regular participation in sport promote good mental health. Likewise, that holds the potential to reduce anxiety and combat negative emotions.
Another point to make is that students can enhance social skills when complete teamwork. Obviously, playing sports teaches them about teamwork and cooperating with others as well teaches them to communicate with others of different ages. Students, as a result, can learn how to listen to their leaders and coaches to perform their individual roles, when working as a team. Overall, parents should encourage their children at all the ages to take part in outdoor activities to promote their soft skill and co-operation that lay the foundation for their future.
As mentioned, the advent of technology enables children to access electronic gadgets and become addicted. Therefore, it is advisable infants should join in outdoor activity to avoid sedentary lifestyle and be fully developed.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51171875 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94743323434 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66015625 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2885383529 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184133226483 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520929975187 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479474628213 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104538693567 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044270781144 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.