Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the
problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do
you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the differences in finance of family would impact on method that the child handling their issues in the future. However, whether individuals who were raised in rich families would tackle the problems better than those who come from poor families has caused a heated debate. My view is that children who grow up in poor families are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents.
It is obvious that poor kids have to suffer from a lot of unfair conditions such as limited in food, education, basic human needs and so on. Thus, they are familiar with bad things, dealing with them to find the solution since young. Meanwhile, rich kids have all available facilities and are provided everything they want. Furthermore, all their problems have been solved straightforwardly by money and by parents. They immerse themselves in comfortable and adequate childhood and overlook methods to cope with problems.
In addition, poor children were taught and implement a lot of practical skills which essential for their adult life such as cooking, gardening, fixing things, taking care of babies and so on; while rich ones have not been trained for such basic works. In the result, poor children easily keep pace with adult activities than the rich child. For example, in case of losing electricity in several days, a person who able to cook, washing the clothes, clean the house and other basic living skills by hand would be highly valued than one who even could not take care of themselves in limited conditions. Indeed, the advance of money could make the paucity of living skills for individuals, especially in the case of dealing with difficult events.
It also true that some rich kid was train feasible skills by their parents and have ability to quickly adapt with changes and hard things. But those cases are few.
In conclusion, in term of the social environment, kids come from poor family have been went through and learnt how to cope with difficult things while those who were raised by rich parents rarely know the dark side of life so have no idea to face with this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Spring2019 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- The three bar charts show average years of schooling numbers of scientists and technicians and research and development spending in developing and developed countries Figures are given for 1980 and 1990 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- alterations and differences in average house prices in five major cities over the period from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...g electricity in several days, a person who able to cook, washing the clothes, clean the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...ealing with difficult events. It also true that some rich kid was train feasible s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90591397849 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44029764726 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545698924731 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5130229521 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282153756499 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960283504837 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155376158747 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146625051602 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144341412014 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.