Cloning
As human's lives are extending, the question of producing genetically identical individuals is becoming more pressing. For most, it is an unacceptable idea but there are some dissenting voices, claiming that by providing spare organs and body parts it would play a role in saving lives. I oppose the idea of cloning for moral as well as more practical reasons.
Firstly there is an ethical dilemma, derived from religious beliefs. Most of the global population holds faith in a supernatural power that created humankind. For them, cloning is an abomination. Whatsmore, there is a question of soul and conscious mind that genetically created person would possibly have. Following this thought, treating their bodies as storage for spare parts would be cruel. Let us look at the first ever clone: a sheep. The animal not only looked like other species of its kind but also behaved like one, had its own consciousness. Therefore human clones would possess the same qualities as the rest of us.
There are also more pragmatic issues: overpopulation and selectivism of the process. As human's population keeps growing rapidly, extending the lives would dramatically increase the number, reducing an access to the resources for all of us. Furthermore, it is very likely that the process of cloning would be a premium service, available to chosen few, most likely the richest on the earth or otherwise privileged. In my opinion, the lack of inclusivity would cause the development of an underground market of genetically created copies and crime that would swiftly follow.
In conclusion, the subject of creating cloned copies rises understandable disquiet. In my opinion, it is one of the rare scientific discoveries that should have stayed a subject of sci-fi literature, as it comes with too many dilemmas: moral as well as
Practical ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- Graph chart computers 78
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- 3 spreads 73
- Government should find scientific research rather than commercial organization To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 555, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ed like one, had its own consciousness. Therefore human clones would possess the same qua...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...matically increase the number, reducing an access to the resources for all of us. Further...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d copies rises understandable disquiet. In my opinion, it is one of the rare scien...
^^
Line 8, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with too many dilemmas: moral as well as Practical ones.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19798657718 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89572428492 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5446007198 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1176470588 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209250842043 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884460162759 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123484869833 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132307933945 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486525533095 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.