Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technologies have developed in various ways, especially in education so it is very common to see that, children and teachers are familiar with technological learning environments. Even though some might argue that the role for teachers will be disappeared due to this phenomenon, I completely disagree. The reason for this is that, teachers are not merely providing the knowledge to children but also teach other several skills that are related to society. Therefore, I am sure that there will be a teacher in education in the future.
Computers have evolved in various ways to improve people’s standard of living. In particular, the education fields have benefited from technological advancement. For example, nowadays it is very common to see that teachers are using computers or other materials such as video projectors, to show relevant information related to the subjects for the students to understand better. In other words, all the knowledge and information are now available commonly on computers which might not require of teacher’s help and the familiarity with the technological environments can create the extinction of the professors’ or teachers’ occupations in the foreseeable future.
In contrast, teachers’ roles are not merely providing information or knowledge to students, but also they provide practical skills such as bonding, effective communication, socialization and relationships. By having a relationship with a teacher, students can learn societal skills just like the employer and employee relationships in reality. From this relationship, students may understand the way of communication and behaviours to be suitable to society. Furthermore, teachers can also teach children about non-educational matters such as ethic, moral and justice which are the basic of society. Since those psychological skills cannot be taught by technologies yet and therefore, teachers’ occupations will be in demand in the future.
In conclusion, the rate of improvement in technology is getting faster and it may seem a threat to teachers’ position since most of information and knowledge can be sought from it. However, teachers’ role is not only limited to providing lessons to children. In my perspective, teachers provide various skills including practical and psychological skills which cannot be replaced by machine. Hence, teacher’s position would not be extinct in the future.
- People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasingly early age. Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example. 61
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in particular', 'such as', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266666666667 0.247107183377 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.137931034483 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0850574712644 0.0946595960268 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0597701149425 0.0501214627716 119% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0183908045977 0.0437548338989 42% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11724137931 0.122226691241 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0390804597701 0.0403226058552 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.46583001893 2.80594681477 124% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0344827586207 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.064367816092 0.0861772015684 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.032183908046 0.021408717616 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00919540229885 0.011925033212 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2446.0 1933.35771543 127% => OK
No of words: 364.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.71978021978 6.12580529183 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.442307692308 0.374742101984 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.373626373626 0.28420135186 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.307692307692 0.203846283523 151% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.211538461538 0.137316102897 154% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46583001893 2.80594681477 124% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.56093040696 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.2776619996 60.7387585426 86% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4117647059 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.300769935 49.517814964 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.882352941 127.492653851 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.814263465372 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 58.7744020685 49.1944974215 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.95744680851 1.69124875643 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351218495174 0.332605444948 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106894826089 0.102741220458 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0589716955181 0.0668466124924 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515223281077 0.534860350844 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102745590692 0.148594505496 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148807368388 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566933751793 0.0742795772207 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.443073797524 0.324371583561 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0275442469822 0.0638462369009 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257691180561 0.228012699653 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038640401296 0.058150111329 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.