Convinience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is undeniable that the increasing availability of convenience foods has been a significant features of modern life in many developed countries. Some people believe that with advances in food technology, traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation will disappear. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this idea.
It is true that today many people do not ve enough time to cook and that convenience fods are an attractive option. Besides, these foods have improves significant in terms of quality and availability and the range of sale in the average supermarket is quite impressive. It is easily to ready-prepared microwavable. So, people chose available foods instead of traditional foods to saving of time and doing other activities.
However, the growing popularity of television cookery programmes and cook suggest that people should be continue to value traditional ways of preparing foods. Many farmers markets selling fresh and locally-produced food continue to be in many parts of the world. In addition, cooking is really basic, natural ingredients are cheaper than buying processed foods. Moreover, traditional foods are an important in terms of culture and social life. For example, after a working day, the iusually like to their wife cooking foods for them than eating available foods or going to a restaurant. In addition, many important celebrations such as weddings, Christmas or New Year are prepared by traditional foods.
In conclusion, convenience foods can replace traditional foods are completely unlikely to happen. It is hard to imagine a world in which people do not continue to enjoy traditional,home-cooked meals at least some of the time.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life. 56
- Social media such as Facebook, Twitter is replacing facr-to-face contact in people's lives. DO you think the advatages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 55
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 71
- the diagram shows the main systems of writing used throughout the world 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feature'?
Suggestion: feature
...onvenience foods has been a significant features of modern life in many developed countr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'continued'?
Suggestion: continued
... and cook suggest that people should be continue to value traditional ways of preparing ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'market'.
Suggestion: market
...l ways of preparing foods. Many farmers markets selling fresh and locally-produced food...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , home-cooked
...ple do not continue to enjoy traditional,home-cooked meals at least some of the time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... traditional,home-cooked meals at least some of the time.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, really, so, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42045454545 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26902278766 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0470371844 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354127089202 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124590775573 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119002712682 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245293683102 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107278461361 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.