Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
With the development of international trade and mass production, people all over the world now can have the same access to various kinds of goods. As a result, they become similar, as they may wear same clothes, use identical electronic devices and eat same food. From my point of view, although this trend brings some convenience to humans' lives, its overall impact is detrimental.
It is undeniable that consuming same products can save people a lot of time. For example, fast food chains like KFC and Subway have become working people's first choice when having dinner on weekdays, as it is fast and people don't have to think too much about what to eat. As a consequence, they can finish eating quickly and then spend more time on their work, which helps them advance in their careers and even makes a contribution to social development.
However, the drawbacks of having too much same fast food shall never be overlooked. One of the negative impacts is many people are getting too much weight, which makes them liable to diseases like diabetes and high blood pressure. Also, people who enjoy the convenience of fast food are less likely to cook traditional cuisines. As a result, cultural diversity of a nation might diminish gradually.
In addition, with more people consuming more same products, those who remain loyalty to their preferred products may be regarded as odd individuals, just because their buying decision is standing out. This might lead to bullying in schools and discrimination in the workplace, and thereby causing the uncertainty of the society.
In sum, purchasing same products makes people's lives easy and save substantial amount of time, but it might also result in the diminishing of cultural diversity and the damage of harmonious society where people all respect each other's different choices when buying products.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 50
- TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings att 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r on weekdays, as it is fast and people dont have to think too much about what to ea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09180327869 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64607836572 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7387869171 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239436519567 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735394582451 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545118723522 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126888505867 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476426413196 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.