Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development.
Similarity between the countries is increasing as people are able to get things from anywhere across the world. Due to this, it has reduced the need to travel and it has facilitated our lives. From my perspective, this is advantageous for the people.
When we are able to get the things we want from the place we live, this reduces the need to travel which in turn helps us in saving money. If we want to buy a product native to a particular country, we can find it even in our country. For example, people living in the United States find the south India foods as delicious, due to the reason they find it in their country, they don not have to travel to India to eat it.
In addition to this, the iPhones which were native only to the United States in the year 2007 moved to other parts of the world, due to the growing need of people. Therefore, people can buy it from anywhere, as most of them find it intriguing. Due to this, it had introduced many service centres across the world, one more point worth considering is that fashion is an attribute which was distinct in each country, but due to the globalisation, the different outfits and apparel are available to everyone. Consequently, this had reduced the difference between countries, to illustrate this, a recent survey conducted by the "Vogue" magazine depicts that the attire around the world was distinct but now 80% of the population are fascinated by the same type of looks.
In conclusion, globalisation has made our lives easy as it had reduced the need for travelling and helped us in getting things from the place we live. In my opinion, it has provided us with a comfortable live than in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, people can buy it from anywhere, as most of them find it intriguing. Due ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59800664452 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69973163463 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504983388704 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9216767068 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154190514161 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060451608045 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581586536743 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953233521564 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712342672598 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.