It is true that different nations in the world become more and more similar as many products or services can be bought in anywhere easily. In my view, I completely agree that this is a positive trend for the development of globalisation or international market.
There are several reasons why this modern trend is benefit to all of us. Firstly, the international companies like Apple, Netflix provide more kind of selections for us and those products and services can certainly increase our quality of life. Secondly, the globalisation increases our interaction with global communities. The products from foreign countries not only introduce us the new choices, they also illustrate the multinational cultures. For example, we can understand the living style and traditional celebrations through the Japanese animation and comics. Finally, the products from different regions also develop a healthy competition between the multinational companies. The fast development of smartphones seems to be a good example to demonstrate that rivalry between companies lead to the innovative products.
On the other hand, while some people may argue that the competition from international market will affect the local culture and the domestic economy, I still believe that it is a great opportunity for us to combine the advantages of both foreign and local culture, thus creating a diversity of culture for the society. International companies also provide a variety of job vacancies for local market which also can lower the unemployment rate in the communities. Apart from the work opportunities provided by international companies, domestic industries can grab the chances to enter the international market by domestic products to other countries and providing services for the external regions.
In conclusion, I believe that the modern development of globalization benefits our lives and provides us opportunities to interact with world.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57432432432 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19516017996 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5565779418 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157327633845 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060757370828 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744263443017 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124725922675 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109214381428 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.