Many people argue that the evolution of international trading can lead to the growing similarity between nations. Despite some adverse effects from this trend, I believe that this commercial advance would bring many benefits to all the world.
First of all, there are some obvious drawbacks which nations need to take into consideration before opening their economic barriers. The first problem is the risk of the assimilation which threatens the cultural identity. Importing products from other countries, nations also compel with the integration of other cultures. This phenomenon can be clearly seen in the fashion domain: Nowadays, most people dress suit or follow western style instead of wearing traditional clothes as the daily costume. Another pitfall worth mentioning is that more and more involvement of foreign investors in the local market can accelerate the competitiveness which causes many inconveniences for local businesses, particularly in the developing countries. For instance, attracted by state-of-the-art products imported from other countries, residents easily turn against internal products. Many medium and small enterprises in Vietnam are victims of this issue and have to go bankrupt due to lack of competing capability.
On the other hand, the globalization in the economic area creates more merits than demerits. In terms of macroeconomics, the expansion of importing and exporting helps to enlarge the market; therefore, brings more opportunities for companies to make money as well as for government to earning foreign exchange. Besides, the diversification of products and services is also a key factor which shrinks the distance in living standard between nations. For example, Vietnamese people, these days, have more chance to opt for consuming goods of which price is completely reasonable with high-quality from America or Europe. Finally, using international products is also a means of experience and acknowledge the culture and current technology of the neighbors. Indian handicrafts increasingly consumed in Vietnam is a plausible evidence for the integration and sharing traditional value between two ethics.
In conclusion, certain is the fact that some inland problems associated with culture identity and capacity of local companies should be tackled in case of opening national market. However, I support the idea that this trend does not abolish traditional beauty of each nation but create more benefits for individual economies as well as for their residents.
- Some people think that health care is a basic human necessity that should not be provided by provided private companies But should be provided by state Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of health care being provided by the private sector 56
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option? What sort of punishment should parents and 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...y seen in the fashion domain: Nowadays, most of people dress suit or follow western style inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63989637306 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04028651662 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603626943005 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6614003813 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.058823529 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149863671192 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438996642524 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337185934634 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913976697703 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159684271969 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.