Many developing economies has witnessed search in sale of automobile vehicles unprecedentedly, while their currency is getting stronger. In my opinion, although, purchasing new cars may bring one virtual comfort and social importance actual drawbacks arriving through this for nature are crucial.
Admittedly there is some basic advantages of owning a new car. Firstly, people can experience pleasure in their life. By getting own’s vehicle Google of committing true public transport such as bus, tram or metro can easily be avoided. Though, this can be momentary satisfaction on the cost of increased transit time due to traffic. Secondly, one can consider this as key for new fortune. According to this people owning a luxury car open door for the elite society for them. Which can help them create both new contacts as well as own social image. Consequently, both of these things might help them in their own business.
Nevertheless, despite minor advantages about negative impact of cars on environment is huge. Increasing number of vehicles on street not only causes higher air pollution but also deteriorates human health. Take Indian capital Delhi, as an example where is due to extreme air pollution people have installed air purifiers in home, stopped going out without mask and held many patients hostage in hospital wards who can not survive without pure oxygen. Furthermore, this is also cause of tremendous rainfall reduction. Cape Town, in South Africa declared they ran out of water which caused millions of people to migrate to a new land, leaving their homeland behind.
In conclusion, however, there are negligible advantages of cars, draught, hunger and health are always top on human need inde. Therefore, we can not bet our life on the cost of a car
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s, tram or metro can easily be avoided. Though, this can be momentary satisfaction on ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...is as key for new fortune. According to this people owning a luxury car open door fo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... can help them create both new contacts as well as own social image. Consequently, both of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...ed going out without mask and held many patients hostage in hospital wards who can not s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'caused'.
Suggestion: caused
... pure oxygen. Furthermore, this is also cause of tremendous rainfall reduction. Cape ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an not bet our life on the cost of a car
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18402777778 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7309750688 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673611111111 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0915361342 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8235294118 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112454061096 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364638926325 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407946830788 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616463735068 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195625391275 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.