Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a

While many people believe that tertiary students ought to be study topics of their own pursuit, others consider they should stick with essential topics related to their career ahead. In my opinion, subjects or career stream of personal comfort should be prioritised, which would not only give one satisfaction of his decision making but also happiness while practicing that occupation throughout his life.

One the one hand, I believe, subjects of like while in univerity gives students an upper hand in their chosen topics. This helps such students to be on top of their game and achieve excellence in this particular stream both during curriculum as well as in life. Doctors, lawyers, politicians, singers, actors, and foreign ministry officials for instance, who were not forced to choose thier career stream and followed own willing certainly created a respectable place in society. Furthermore, there are several examples of doctors operating patients wrongly. Deliberate investigations in such matters at a later date revealed that these doctors were forced to choose this occupuation.

One the other hand, many people consider that one must study subjects related to his pre-decided career either by himself or by others. Although, with this type of learning one my secure his future with fixed earning, happiness index remains in oscillatory position for his entire life. Focused learning of technological subjects make these people ready for an employment but not as an entrepreneur. Besides this, people with streamed learning may not acheive exceptional success as thier acheivement gets capped within their organistion.

In conclusion, however, many people consider chosing topics related to future career beneficial for stable lifestyle, I believe life lived on path chosen by self gives eternal satisfaction, which also opens new horizons for our career.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...articular stream both during curriculum as well as in life. Doctors, lawyers, politicians,...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49826989619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75888582807 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.938789929 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186729960169 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662197514899 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643807478121 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112722110988 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719467295211 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.