While many institutions who preseve - heritage, culture or special historical things charge for entry,
there are others who give this accessibility to general public in free of cost. In my opinion, admission
to such places with entrance ticket has more benefits.
Despite minor drawbacks below, admission related with payment brings more advantages for museums. Firstly, crucial benefit with this system is filtration of crowd. By charging appropriate entrace cost, people who do not appreciate or willing to visit these center without any purpose get eliminated; this allows sophisticated crowd to explore and cater knowledge out of rich collection there. Secondly, with admission charge, funding available with these institutions become self satisfactory towards their routine expenditure. These expenses are majorly envisaged towards employee salaries, stationary cost, electricity and heater bills. Finally, due to proper maintenance activities atmosphere within these establishment remains healthy in terms of conservation. This in turn keep valuation of special articles intact.
Admittedly, there are certain downsides involved with free ticketing for museums. One drawback is that sustainibility of museums for longer periods. Hyderabad's Golkonda fort museum had been shut down for several when they have discovered indigenous people from poor families were stealing artefacts and selling them for their survival. A later analysis revealed that, free ticketing system was basis for this motif.
Furthermore, due to inadequate funding people employed here went for an endless stike. Although, these problems could have been solved with simple ticket arrangement system, it was neglected in good faith towards society.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, museums, do suffer through money crisis which leads to further other issues,
these issues can be resolved with minimal admission charge per person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e others who give this accessibility to general public in free of cost. In my opinion, admissi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98545454545 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78701153789 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.738181818182 0.561755894193 131% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1363375582 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255566908326 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761500348823 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629738320897 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103272670402 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689171940934 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.