as countries develop their population tend to live individually small family In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society Is it a positive or negative development

It is true that nowadays, the more countries develop, the more their citizens follow the trend of living individually or in nuclear families. There are many reasons for this trend, and I believe it has both positive and negative effects on society.

To begin with, it seems that young people tend to live away from their families because of the generation gap. Generation gaps in families often leads to different lifestyles, and to prevent conflicts to occur, young people choose to leave their home. For example, a youngster wants to relax by playing his upbeat music out loud, but his parents disapprove it and prefer country music to be played. Additionally, the population now is likely to live in nuclear families rather than extended families, mainly because in small family units, parents will have more time to spend on their children. A child in a nuclear family, for instance, may have a far better relationship with his parents, as they have more time for each other, than a child in an extended family.

In terms of living alone, young people have benefited. They can do everything freely depending on their lifestyles without being judged by their parents. They can come back home late, stay up at night, play anything they like… and so on. On the other hand, people may feel desperate as they have no one to ask for advice and help as when they still lived with their families. This goes the same with nuclear families. Parents can spend more time with children, but the older generations may have far more experiences than a newly couple. Parents know what to do, while grandparents know how to do.

In conclusion, there are many reasons for people to live individually or in nuclear families, and this trend has both benefits and drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('newly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('couple') instead of another adjective.
...ions may have far more experiences than a newly couple. Parents know what to do, while grandpa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8642384106 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50891354267 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559602649007 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0093111372 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178713809985 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608558098278 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557069096904 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116044011702 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631993883036 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.