The two maps illustrate the changes of a present office building in the future.
Overall, it is clear that the building is planned to be extended, with the new outdoor seating area and meeting area, along with a coffee machine. On the other hand, some rooms inside the building will be removed.
At the present time, there are two large grasslands on the left and right of the office. These lands in the future will be replaced by two new areas. The left one will be reconstructed to an outdoor seating place, with several chairs in the south. The right land will be rebuilt into an area for meeting purpose. A new coffee machine will be set in the north of the land, and beside it is the WCs, which is located in the east of the office in the present.
The west entrance of the building will remain the same, as well as the storeroom in the northeast side of the office. However, the kitchen and the canteen in the north will be made into the offices. There are four office rooms in the south and the entrance of their right. In the future, these will be combined into two big offices, with the entrance being moved to the center.
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- as countries develop their population tend to live individually small family In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 83
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41706161137 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16832802271 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0934699807 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102989090355 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522913112635 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663015413502 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103123824438 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094790487626 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.