Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The relationship between average working time and economic success is a complex and multifaceted issue that cannot be reduced to a simple cause-and-effect relationship. While it is true that some countries with long average working hours have achieved significant economic growth, it would be misleading to conclude that longer working hours are the sole determinant of their success.
Countries with a long average working time often exhibit a strong work ethic and a culture of productivity. This can lead to increased output and efficiency in certain sectors, particularly in industries that rely heavily on labor-intensive production processes. Additionally, longer working hours may provide individuals with more opportunities for skill development and career advancement, which can contribute to overall economic growth.
However, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks of long working hours. Extended periods of work without adequate rest and leisure time can lead to burnout, decreased productivity, and negative impacts on physical and mental health. Moreover, excessive working hours can hinder work-life balance, resulting in strained personal relationships and reduced quality of life for individuals.
Furthermore, economic success cannot be solely attributed to working hours. Other factors such as education and skills development, technological advancements, infrastructure, political stability, and access to resources also play crucial roles determining a country's economic performance. Countries with shorter working hours may prioritize work-life balance, employee well-being, and social welfare programs, which can contribute to a higher quality of life and overall societal prosperity.
It is worth noting that there is significant variation among countries regarding average working time and economic success. Some countries with shorter working hours have achieved remarkable economic growth through innovation, efficient resource allocation, and strategic investments. These countries prioritize productivity, creativity, and work efficiency rather than simply relying on longer working hours.
In conclusion, while there may be instances where countries with long average working hours have experienced economic success, it is essential to recognize that this correlation does not imply causation. Economic success is influenced by a multitude of factors, and a balanced approach that considers the well-being of individuals, work-life balance, and other socio-economic factors is crucial for sustainable and inclusive growth.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22191011236 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21671652173 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4992702551 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4375 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405608971039 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160940025364 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925721092736 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247344754007 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603450388804 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.09 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.