Criminals should be judged according to their personal circumctances rather than makimg them receive a fixed punishment. Do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to technological advances, life quality now is significantly improved esspecially in security. It is claimed that cutting edge equipments make a massive contribution to finding out and preventing criminals thus the criminals rate will gradually decrease . I strongly agree with this statement and in this essay I will discuss my point of view.
On the one hand, there are plenty of advantages that technologies bring to our security. First and foremost, technologies have a perfect accuracy. What I mean is that there is no mistake during detecting process, therefore criminals will be correctly jugded. For instance, in Viet Nam, the government equip various modern devices and implement strict law. As an results, many adolescents who have a bad plan will be nervous and give up. Moreover, to deal with delicate criminals, the polices have to use cutting edge devices. In other words, smart devices help police detect the criminals more effectively and faster.
On the other hand, antagonists would argue that falling criminals proportions depend on other factors. One of the most popular factors is attemption of polices. It cannot be denied that efforts of government play a vital role in catching criminals and preventing them. For example, thanks to their warnings and punishment, people are awere of their behaviours to avoid illegal activities. Furthermore, a lot of money seem to be allocated to army and security force. Therefore, crowed and strong polices forces would easily protect our life from criminals.
In conclusion, Technological advances bring to us a lot of merits related to the fair accuracy and the effectiveness, however, there are some irreplaceable factors involved in governments’ efforts and investment.
- Discuss the pros and cons of learning online 73
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages for their study 73
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- Some people laws should be passed to assess what nutrition and food choices to improve public health Others think it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e criminals rate will gradually decrease . I strongly agree with this statement an...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rn devices and implement strict law. As an results, many adolescents who have a ba...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: an result; results
...rn devices and implement strict law. As an results, many adolescents who have a bad plan w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39926739927 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04130024267 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3398034513 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7058823529 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10024708098 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281290673923 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320809616263 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526010738119 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372483306414 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.