It is true that using alternative methods of medication, like homeopathy, is significantly popular nowadays but they lack effectiveness and may even prove fatal. In my opinion, this problem is widespread and should be dealt with immediately.
The reasons behind alternative ways of treatment being useless are numerous. Firstly, the drugs used are not tested in laboratories and have limited evidence available to back their therapeutic capabilities. Secondly, the ingredients used in these medicines are mostly herbal and they are not processed to work on human body appropriately. Furthermore, these organic ingredients are often poisonous or polluted with impurities that can trigger allergies in patients. On top of this, despite rampant practice of herbal medicine throughout the history, there is a serious problem regarding documentation of indications as well as side effects of these pharmacological interventions. So, a lack of in-depth knowledge and understanding of these medicines renders them largely useless for treating diseases.
In worst case scenarios, these conventional methods can even lead to morbidity and mortality. For instance, acute kidney failure is a medical condition that involves temporary shutdown of kidney function but timely treatment can restore them in their healthy state. However, a recent study conducted in Oxford university showed large number of cases where patients opted for alternative treatment options and did not get timely treatment, pushing them into permanent kidney damage. Another factor that is responsible for fatality of conventional treatment methods is poor qualification and skill of its practitioners. The experts are not equipped with proper knowledge of human anatomy and physiology so, they do more harm than good.
In conclusion, although alternative ways of medicine have been common since ancient times, I strongly believe they are redundant and may even become life-threatening. Therefore, necessary measures should be taken to prevent such practices so that effective health care could be provided to people.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'In the worst'.
Suggestion: In the worst
...argely useless for treating diseases. In worst case scenarios, these conventional meth...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74110032362 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16946634453 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644012944984 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.373038308 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.266666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181244909604 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590732897363 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033300133867 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111944746141 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349463385467 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.