Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous.
To what extend do you agree with this statement?
Along with the revolutionary developments in modern medical treatments, which are stimulated by scientific advancement, is the growing reputation of alternative medicines. Yet, these have been subjected to disapproving attitudes of individuals who remain highly skeptical of their potential impacts. Amid the voice of vehement opposition, I advocate the use of alternative methods with a firm belief in their contribution to humans’ health.
On the one hand, the claim of the alternative medicines’ failure in dealing with ailment arises from the yet thorough observation of their influence. While a pill produced in accordance to carefully contemplated amounts of chemicals can help to relieve a pain shortly after being taken, the prescribed combination of different herbals, for instance, obviously demands a longer time for any positive effects to emerge. Such prolonged periods may drain users of energy as well as trust. It should be noted, in addition, that acute and common health conditions, for example cold, can be effectively tackled using certain traditional cures, one of which is taking a sauna whose source of water is added with a number of ginger slices and lemon leaves.
On the other hand, the two distinguished name tags of scientific treatments and alternative ones create the impression of the latter being completely detached from science. Reality, however, has provided sufficient evidence in support of the opposite. Whereas it is crystal clear that the vast majority of alternative medicine applications are known thanks to words from previous generations who are unlikely to recite the mechanism for such usage, there is a sophisticated construction of logic. The relationship between a specific selection of different-sized needles and the working of body chemicals is scrutinised by students majoring in the scientific study branch known as indigenous medicines. These learners, who are equipped with years of accumulated knowledge and experience, subsequently prescribe a treatment based on science rather than on intuition.
In conclusion, it is time the public set their mind free from the subjective beliefs revolving around alternative medicines’ unfavorable impacts, which are the undesirable results of inconsiderate study into their healing effects and the conventional thought that science and traditional treatments cannot form a harmonious marriage. Alternative medicines, thus, are worthy of recognition for their medical values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-20 | Valentinka | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | phamdothuytien | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | sujan116 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | sroye Mandeep | 78 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72162162162 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20778476933 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624324324324 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3938839843 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.214285714 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127840442461 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423644169792 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280607847427 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767796688265 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193116722445 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72162162162 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20778476933 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624324324324 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3938839843 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.214285714 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127840442461 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423644169792 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280607847427 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767796688265 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193116722445 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.