It is claimed that cycling has more beneficial impacts on the environment than other means of transport. While this type of vehicle is not utilized in many areas, this essay will indicate ways to encourage people to use it more often.
Two reasons are to blame for the small number of bicycle users in various places. Chief of these is that given the simple structures, cycling provokes users into anger while dealing with more difficulties in reaching their destinations compared to other modes of vehicles such as car or motorbike. Due to its particular function, many people feel exhausted after using it for a long time, which may lead to physical health problems for bikers. Apart from that, bicycles may certainly not be convenient enough for cyclists in some conditions. This is predicted in the case that with carrying large luggages, people can find difficulties in terms of riding this type of transport for long-hauls. Therefore, cycling is not well-known in some places.
This state of affairs can be solved with some possible solutions. Regarding the fact that cycling is environmentally friendly, governments should raise awareness of the citizens by suggesting riding bikes for short routes in urban areas instead of using cars or motorbikes which mostly use fossil fuels. This change in lifestyle could significantly alleviate the carbon emission as well as respiratory issues in big cities. In addition, bicycle contests with valuable prizes should be held annually so as to increase the number of bikers. This can be seen in Vietnam where cycling competitions are strongly encouraged along with environment protection campaigns and volunteer work. This not only can create regular habits for cyclists but also deliberately promote politicians to allocate more spending to cycling infrastructure investments.
In conclusion, while cycling has not gained popularity in some areas because of several reasons, immediate remedies should be accomplished in order to promote this means of transport.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 67
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...valuable prizes should be held annually so as to increase the number of bikers. This can...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37223974763 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86750268086 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605678233438 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2419037148 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.533333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15762237894 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526320051202 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583124658032 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11090977108 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435259090996 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.