With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet. What potential problems may this trend lead to? What solutions can you suggest to deal with it?
Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the proportion of unsupervised Interet access especially in the younger generations, receiving a great deal of media attention. Although the problems pertaining to this situation can be pronounced, they are not without solution.
There are a multitude of problems ensuing when it comes to unsupervised access to the Internet. First, Internet Usage without parental guidance could act as an incentive for juveniles’ exposure to some aggressive and even pornographic content. These materials would contribute to a high degree of obssession in the youngers, leading to some mental impairments. Second, Access to the Internet under no parental control could culminate in some deleterious repurcussions on the children’s academic achievements. In fact, Too much time spent on browsing the Internet is invariably associated with s substantial reduction in the level of concentration on academic learning in children, which is a hindrance to their making progesss.
Nonetheless, there are also many potential measures to alleviate these problems. there is an urgent demand for higher degree of parents supervision to the young people’s usage of the Internet. Due to a stricter restriction of internet usage, teenagers would be less sensitive to X-rated and other violent materials and subsequently have a healthier lifestyle. In addition, The legislation of imposing pecuniary penalty on antisocial materials without the governmental censorship shoud be enacted. This law would be instrumental in the decrease in the mainstreaming of these materials as the producers would take the heavy fine into consideration.
In conclusion, although Internet access without appropriate guidance could result in a whole host of issues, the parental control and the governmental intervention should be corporated to eradicate this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...l measures to alleviate these problems. there is an urgent demand for higher degree o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83032490975 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37626392271 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.87432029 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170609424747 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596924905377 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393766478035 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103820453876 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313826374576 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.