With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it

Technology nowadays is so advance that people can communicate to anyone anywhere across the globe through the use of the internet. This trend is mostly famous for youngsters were they use a tool like social media to communicate, video chat or even meet unknown people face to face virtually, which tends to be risky and life-threatening. This essay aims to vividly elaborate this negative trend, followed by logical solutions.

Firstly, it is crystal clear that the internet helps us in our daily lives. People can now connect to people in different locations in real-time. But despite all these merits, burglars also innovate their ways to initiate crimes. For example, youngsters tend to use Facebook which is one of the most popular social media nowadays to be friends with other users around the world, to reconnect to a lost friend or relatives in the past. Thieves, mostly pretend to be a poser of someone the victim knows, and miss lead him to send money or even hacks the persons gadget to send his location trough GPS. Secondly, crime like identity theft is very common in this modern world, and youngones are easy targets. Assailant tends to study a person activities and information and use all of it to do bad things such as scamming, fake ID creation or even using youngones credit card.

These problems are serious, thus an action should be executed as soon as possible. One unique solution for this is to limit the use gadgets for teens. For instance, students can only use their tablet or smartphones for study purposes. Moreover, parents should educate their siblings about the potential danger of communicating to strangers. Advice such as "Don't talk to strangers" and "I'll consult Mom first" is one of the oldest but most effective way to repel this. Lastly, the government should also take this matter on hand seriously. Local officials should strengthen there law enforcement officers to not just fight physically but also virtually. Deploying white hat hackers in the web will help the students to be secure surfing and using any social media tools.

To conclude, despite of advancement of technology which enables us to convey thoughts easily using social media. In my opinion, youngsters should be guided and educated to the threats involved in using social media sites. Moreover, the government should elevate its fighting crime technique to conquer the web and make it secure evenly the way they do it in this physical world.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ead him to send money or even hacks the persons gadget to send his location trough GPS....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...ting to strangers. Advice such as 'Dont talk to strangers' and 'Ill c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...;Dont talk to strangers' and 'Ill consult Mom first' is one of the o...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0512195122 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66174454026 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592682926829 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5859081313 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.619047619 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16000080975 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451101505985 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345759835146 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103005313413 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201132988724 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.