Developments in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The advent of modern technology was seen to make huge transformation to human’s lives. Along with obvious advantages of technology, it also imposes several constraints on the sustainability of the environment. Many claim people should simplify our lives, whereas others propose new technology as the solution to such problem.
On the one hand, technological inventions have proceeded beyond one can imagine and still continue to grow. In comparison to the old times, everyone is far from the chance to use hybrid transport vehicles, which are the main contributor to the ever-increasing carbon dioxide emission and fresh air shortage. It is a common belief that the use of bicycles shall alleviate this problem, significantly improving the air quality. In addition, young people, especially children without parental supervision, tend to overuse electronic devices, personal computers or smart phones in particular. By doing so, the amount of electricity consumed has increased over periodical times, raising much public concern about excess power consumption. In fact, some parents strongly recommend the rule of strictly prohibiting mobile devices and computers except for work-related and educational purposes. This way, pressure on the world’s energy resources could be reduced.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied about the profound development of human intelligence. Given the environment downside, modern technology has made enormous shift to solve its own problem. As a matter of fact, the invention of wind turbines or solar power generator is likely to lessen our overdependence on fossil fuel as a major energy source. Furthermore, although electronic transportation is solely in early phase of development, it could be considered as green technology which does not only protect the environment, but also plays a role in preserving global resources. When people have a thorough understanding of how green technology is being applied, they are able to take advantage of it with a brand new perspective.
In conclusion, despite the benefits in terms of absence of technology in our lives, I am truly of the idea that incorporating environmentally friendly equipment in daily activities should be effective on a large scale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- A large number of young people cannot find jobs after they leave school. What problems will youth unemployment cause in individual and for society? What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among young people? 89
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 89
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs.What problems this causes? What are solutions? 61
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today's world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...nability of the environment. Many claim people should simplify our lives, whereas othe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, whereas, except for, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56395348837 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24476947325 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662790697674 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8044361643 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119665583103 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349421385844 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029825558845 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739269367593 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291851144356 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.