Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that the question of whether science and technology or a simpler lifestyle can preserve the environment remains a source of controversy in the community. While many people argue that an uncomplicated lifestyle will conserve environmental problems, I believe that the progress of science and technology will tackle the problems concerned with the environment
On the one hand, humans think that a simpler lifestyle will address environmental concerns for two main reasons. Firstly, people living in a simpler way means that the demands for living are less. Their requirement for food decreases, as a result the amount of waste thrown away the environment is less which contributes to reducing water and air pollution. Moreover, this will limit the amount of gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles which lead to global warming. Therefore, the issues concerned with the environment will be minimized.
On the other hand, I believe that the improvement of science and technology will help protect the environment. One reason is that there are more and more the advents and inventions in science and technology which help address environmental problems. The more progressive the sociality is, the higher the demands of people are. As we can see that the amount of rubbish humans throw away such as plastic bags, cans and bottles is bigger and the demands for travel increase significantly. With the new technology, humans can invent new ways to produce paper bags and products that can be recycled to protect the environment instead of plastic ones. Furthermore, for instance, with the improvement in technology and science, humans can manufacture E5 gasoline which reduces CO2 emission emitted to air and saves fossil fuel. Besides, many nations in the world have built solar power plants that use renewable energy to curb the use of non-renewable sources.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that science and technology can solve environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | lehonganh1212 | 89 | view |
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 73
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- 2 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas Surroundings 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether science and technology or a simpler lif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r and air pollution. Moreover, this will limit the amount of gas emissions from f...
^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy and science, humans can manufacture E5 gasoline which reduces CO2 emission e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29102167183 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90142602239 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0457683599 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213646837966 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734322986457 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823867944057 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148313160941 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590488832958 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.