The diagram below gives information about the Mont-Blanc road tunnel and the Seikan Railway tunnel
The diagram illustrates the cross-sections of the Mont-Blanc Road Tunnel and the Seikan Railway tunnel
Overall, It is clear that the Mont-Blanc Road tunnel is much longer than Seikan Railway tunnel and while Mont-Blanc Road is through the mountain, Seikan Railway tunnel is located below the strait.
Obviously, The length of Mont-Blanc Road tunnel is 11.6 km and it took 8 years for the installation from 1957. Additionally this tunnel links between two countries of France and Italia through a mountain which has the height of 3.5 km.
However, The construction of Seikan railway appears to be more complicated and took more time than Mont-Blanc Road. The construction time for Seikan Railway is six times longer (42 years). The total length is 53.85 km, connecting two cities of Hakodate and Aomori, located in Hokkaido and Japanese Islands respectively. Besides, the railway lies underneath the Tsugaru Strait with the distance of 240m.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-06 | grahamoneil | 62 | view |
- The bar chart shows information about reasons why men and women make a trip 84
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentence. Others, however, think there are better alternative ways to reduce crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- the pie chart shows the percentages of expenditure on different items in USA 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...8 years for the installation from 1957. Additionally this tunnel links between two countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 151.0 315.596192385 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29801324503 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 4.20363070211 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78196148057 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 176.041082164 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 506.74238477 42% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7868159119 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504043133998 0.244688304435 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185089173063 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208940220831 0.0667982634062 313% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380322667776 0.151304729494 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20152754035 0.056905535591 354% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 78.4519038076 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.