The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.gree?
The bar chart compares the amount of oil produced by several Gulf countries on a daily basis from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount of oil over 2 –decade-period, Qatar’s oil capacity was the lowest.
In 1990, over 8 million of oil barrels were produced in Saudi Arabia as opposed to nearly 1 million of Qatar. In the following decades, Although oil production in Saudi Arabia saw a massive increase by about 6 million of barrels, that of Qatar remained constant at around 1 million.
The other four countries were all similar in terms of an upward trend. The production of oil in Iraq and Kuwait both stood at around 2 million of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both peaked at approximately 4 million of barrels despite the stability in UAE’s oil capacity in 1990 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-10 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outwiegh the disadvantages? 11
- Topic Noise pollution is most certainly increasing at an alarming rate in many industrialised countries What are the problems and in what ways can this problem be overcome 60
- The bar chart shows information about reasons why men and women make a trip 84
- Everyone should stay at school until 18 To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1990 to 2010. It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70322580645 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68901492162 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2083191421 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250699947542 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123929902759 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741218689244 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164441785287 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772899097791 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.