Directors and leaders of organizations are often older people. Some people say that it is better to have young people as leaders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided on whether the leadership of companies should be elderly people. While I accept that the old have certain outstanding personalities, I believe that the young should be afforded chances to become a leader.
On the one hand, aged people can become a good leader for some reasons. Firstly, they are more seasoned than younger ones. Because they have worked for many years, they can have more work experience than beginners. This may enable them to make the right decision when working, which contributes to the success of their companies. Secondly, the old tend to be more poised than the young. They have undergone vicissitudes in life, so they do not tend to be as arrogant or impulsive as adolescents. Instead, they are able to contain their emotions better in any circumstance.
On the other hand, I believe it would be better for young people to become a leader. The first reason is that they are usually more creative than senior workers. The young can find new approaches and make better improvements, which benefits their organizations. For example, a young leader can come up with new marketing strategies for a product, contributing to increasing sales of a company. Moreover, younger people are physically stronger than older ones. They are less likely to be caught with typical diseases of old people such as headaches or dizziness. Therefore, they can work under much pressure and handle the onus of a leader, which some aged people are unable to do.
In conclusion, although the old have certain advantages, I believe that the young should be given opportunities to become a good leader of enterprises.
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- Directors and leaders of organizations are often older people Some people say that it is better to have young people as leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00732600733 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.790530909 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1383138422 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4117647059 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239950978115 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847641918913 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793024613261 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145495895132 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764404143577 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.