Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers. Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that higher-position executives get higher financial compensation than normal workers while some posit that the wage gap is seemingly inappropriate. This essay will discuss both perspectives and the reasons why I am in favor of the latter.
On the one hand, the advocates of higher monetary rewards would maintain that this situation is reasonable considering the duties they, directorial executives of large corporations, have to deal with. Taking the most significant responsibilities to organize and maintain the mechanism of an organization of numerous job positions, they have more burdens to contend with. The weight of these duties can make them incur immense pressure, leading to heightened levels of stress. Anne Clark, the former chief product manager of Microsoft, launched the project called Soli enabling disabled people to effortlessly access the Internet with the help of technological advancement. Not only was she responsible for managing her own human resources of over 200 people, but she also had to ensure the project worked without any unforeseeable obstructions. This is a testament to why leaders deserve significantly bigger financial rewards.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that this unfair salary gap is unjustifiable since any occupation has to shoulder a considerable amount of pressure. Employees, who are still under the superintendence of their bosses, have to continue working hard to acquire the provided bare minimum requirements in order not to be made redundant, especially in this competitive marketplace. Given that, it is unfair for someone to have more favorable compensation packages, meaning that everyone needs to be equally financially rewarded, at least according to their productivity. This can be exemplified that although both leaders and their subordinates have similar tasks that need to be completed in the same time course, that the former gain a significantly greater amount of rewards makes the situation become unacceptable.
In conclusion, acknowledging that each viewpoint has its own merits, I contend that ordinary working people deserve salaries as fair as those in management positions on account of their sharing circumstances of facing challenges and exerting themselves to achieve the mutual goals of the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide Co2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, as to, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59659090909 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20337160157 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6685605755 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.538461538 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119107059827 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392006017118 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474877606063 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776540564163 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582104646046 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, as to, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59659090909 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20337160157 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6685605755 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.538461538 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119107059827 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392006017118 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474877606063 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776540564163 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582104646046 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.