Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers. Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that higher-position executives get higher financial compensation than normal workers while some posit that the wage gap is seemingly inappropriate. This essay will discuss both perspectives and the reasons why I am in favor of the latter.
On the one hand, the advocates of higher monetary rewards would maintain that this situation is reasonable considering the duties they, directorial executives of large corporations, have to deal with. Taking the most significant responsibilities to organize and maintain the mechanism of an organization of numerous job positions, they have more burdens to contend with. The weight of these duties can make them incur immense pressure, leading to heightened levels of stress. For example, Anne Clark, the former chief product manager of Microsoft, launched the project called Soli enabling disabled people to effortlessly access the Internet with the help of technological advancement. Not only was she responsible for managing her own human resources of over 200 people, but she also had to ensure the project worked without any unforeseen obstructions. This is a testament to why leaders deserve significantly bigger financial rewards.
On the other hand, some, myself included, argue that this unfair salary gap is unjustifiable since any occupation has to shoulder a considerable amount of pressure. Employees, who are still under the superintendence of their bosses, have to continue working hard to acquire the provided bare minimum requirements in order not to be made redundant, especially in this competitive marketplace. Given that, it is unfair for someone to have more favorable compensation packages, meaning that everyone needs to be equally financially rewarded, at least according to their productivity. This can be exemplified that although both leaders and their subordinates have similar tasks that need to be completed in the same time course, that the former gain a significantly greater amount of rewards makes the situation become unacceptable.
In conclusion, taking into consideration that each viewpoint has its own merits, I contend that ordinary working people deserve salaries as fair as those in management positions on account of their sharing circumstances of facing challenges and exerting themselves to achieve the mutual goals of the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 73
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58426966292 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17629936671 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0275910053 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.923076923 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117474469634 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390988192096 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474894164988 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771856376188 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058528584611 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58426966292 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17629936671 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0275910053 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.923076923 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117474469634 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390988192096 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474894164988 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771856376188 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058528584611 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.